2 min read
Am I Underutilized?
Federal contractors covered under Executive Order (EO) 11246 are required to conduct several quantitative analyses as part of their affirmative...
2 min read
Federal contractors covered under Executive Order (EO) 11246 are required to conduct several quantitative analyses as part of their affirmative...
1 min read
The Settlement was announced on 6/28/13 and may be viewed on the EEOC Website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/6-28-13c.cfm. The details...
2 min read
The federal contractor community has been anticipating a 2013 final rule updating affirmative action and nondiscrimination obligations regarding...
2 min read
The ruling was handed down on 6/24/13 [2013 U.S. LEXIS 4703]. The issue of whether an alleged harasser is a supervisor or co-worker is important...
2 min read
In Fiscal Year 2012, 30% of all OFCCP compliance evaluations closed with a technical conciliation agreement. Compare this number to FY 2004, where 5%...
2 min read
The ruling was handed down on 6/24/13 [2013 U.S. LEXIS 4701]. In a 7-1 vote (with Justice Kagan not participating), the Court decided that the...
1 min read
In our first Outreach to Veterans blog, we focused on developing a veteran recruitment strategy that considered resources available to you and how to...
2 min read
In an effort to strengthen regulatory requirements related to veteran affirmative action and nondiscrimination, the OFCCP released in April 2011 a...
1 min read
Because DCI has noticed an increase in the number of OFCCP requests for copies of job descriptions, we thought this might be a good time to discuss...
2 min read
Art recently described a pay equity ruling that was declined for review by the Supreme Court. At the heart of the ruling was the difference between...
1 min read
Many readers are familiar with the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), which describe the standards by which EEO regulatory...
1 min read
The case is Davis v. Cintas, decided by the 6th Circuit on 5/30/13 [2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10856]. This case is very much like Dukes v. Wal-Mart [131...